Dickens vs Hugo: The Rivalry of Two Giants Who Admired the Work and Loathed the Man
Partager
In the grand pantheon of world literature, few figures loom as large as Charles Dickens and Victor Hugo. They were not merely writers; they were colossi, national monuments whose words shaped the social and political consciousness of the 19th century. From opposite sides of the English Channel, they wielded their pens like swords, carving out epic narratives of human suffering, social injustice, and the desperate, enduring quest for redemption. They were contemporaries, champions of the common person, and architects of the modern social novel. And while they shared a profound and public admiration for one another's genius, their personal relationship was a study in contrasts—a fascinating tale of professional respect soured by a fundamental clash of personality. This is the story of two titans who could appreciate each other's reflection in the vast mirror of literature, but couldn't stand to be in the same room: a rivalry of ego, style, and spirit that played out across the narrow strait separating England and France.
Parallel Thrones, Shared Crusades
To understand the dynamic between Dickens and Hugo, one must first grasp their mirrored status. In England, Charles Dickens was more than an author; he was an institution. His serialized novels were national events, his characters—from Oliver Twist to Ebenezer Scrooge—became part of the cultural lexicon. He was the great chronicler of London's squalor and splendor, the voice that exposed the brutal realities of the workhouse, the debtors' prison, and the unforgiving machinery of the Industrial Revolution. Across the water, Victor Hugo occupied a similar, if not more deified, position in France. He was the soul of French Romanticism, a poet, playwright, and novelist whose work was inextricably linked with the turbulent history of his nation. Hugo was a moral compass, a political exile who spoke with the authority of a prophet, and the creator of an epic world populated by figures like Jean Valjean, Quasimodo, and Esmeralda.
Their thematic obsessions ran in remarkably parallel channels. Both men were moved to outrage by the plight of the poor and the dispossessed. Dickens’s London is a labyrinth of suffering, where orphans are exploited and the poor are criminalized. Hugo’s Paris is a character in itself, a city of barricades and sewers, where the wretched of the earth—*les misérables*—fight for a sliver of dignity. Both writers took aim at the failures of institutions. Dickens satirized the labyrinthine legal system in *Bleak House* and the heartless logic of utilitarianism in *Hard Times*. Hugo, in *The Last Day of a Condemned Man* and *Les Misérables*, launched a frontal assault on the barbarity of the death penalty and the cruelties of the justice system. Their novels were not escapist fantasies; they were powerful instruments of social change, intended to awaken the conscience of a generation. Dickens’s masterpiece, A Tale of Two Cities, set against the backdrop of the French Revolution, can be seen as a direct engagement with the very historical forces that animated Hugo's own national epics, creating a literary dialogue across the Channel about the nature of justice, sacrifice, and societal upheaval.
Admiration From a Distance
This shared sense of mission fostered a deep, mutual respect for each other’s work. Victor Hugo was an unabashed admirer of Dickens. During his long exile in the Channel Islands, he became a devoted reader, acquiring a full set of Dickens’s novels. He saw the English author not as a rival, but as a fellow soldier in the same great battle for humanity. Hugo praised Dickens as a novelist of the people, one who possessed the rare gift of making readers weep and laugh in the same breath. In a letter written after Dickens’s death, Hugo declared, “He was one of the great men of the nineteenth century... The sympathies of all were with him; he had in his favour the great crowd, and that which is the great crowd in art, originality.” For Hugo, Dickens’s power lay in his profound empathy, his ability to illuminate the darkness of the modern city and find the spark of goodness in the most wretched of souls. Reading through the monumental works in our Victor Hugo collection, one can feel this same driving force, this epic compassion for humanity that he so recognized in his English counterpart.
Dickens, for his part, was more reserved in his praise, but the admiration was undeniable. He was keenly aware of Hugo’s monumental status in French letters. He had read *Notre-Dame de Paris* and recognized the raw, elemental power of Hugo's imagination. While Dickens’s own style was more grounded in the particularities of character and place, he could not help but be impressed by the sheer scale and ambition of Hugo's literary projects. The Englishman, a master of intricate plotting and psychological nuance, saw in the Frenchman a different kind of genius—one that operated on a mythic, almost biblical scale. This was not the affection of friendship, but the sober, professional acknowledgment of one master craftsman for another. Both men understood that they were engaged in the same herculean task: using fiction to tell the truth about their age.
An Awkward Encounter: The Clash of Personalities
If their literary admiration formed a bridge across the Channel, their personal interaction was a shipwreck. The most well-documented encounter between the two occurred in 1857, when Dickens, along with his friend and future biographer John Forster, visited Hugo at his exile home, Hauteville House, in Guernsey. The scene was set for a meeting of minds, but it quickly devolved into a comedy of mismatched egos. Hugo, in exile, had cultivated a persona that was part political martyr, part secular saint. His home was a monument to his own genius, a bizarre, self-designed gothic palace filled with symbolic carvings and inscriptions of his own maxims. He received visitors not as a host, but as an oracle receiving pilgrims.
Dickens, ever the pragmatist and sharp-eyed observer of human folly, was both fascinated and appalled. He was a performer himself, but his stage was the lecture hall, his art a carefully managed public persona. Hugo’s performance was his entire existence. The French titan subjected his English guests to a lengthy, dramatic reading of his own poetry, an experience Dickens found excruciatingly dull. In letters to friends, Dickens described the visit with a tone of bemused exasperation. He acknowledged Hugo’s “very considerable power” but could not shake the feeling that the man was fundamentally “a theatrical character,” always posturing, always performing his own greatness. He wrote that Hugo and his acolytes lived in a state of “mutual-admiration-society,” seemingly oblivious to the world outside their self-constructed mythology. Dickens, a man of immense energy and practical concerns, found Hugo’s monomaniacal self-absorption and ponderous solemnity almost unbearable. The visit confirmed what their writing already suggested: these were two fundamentally different men.
The Prose and the Person
This profound personal incompatibility is mirrored in their literary styles. Dickens’s prose, for all its sentimentality and sprawling subplots, is rooted in the tangible world. It is the style of a journalist, a keen-eyed walker of city streets who notices the exact shade of grime on a windowpane, the particular way a character nervously rubs his hands, the sounds and smells of a London market. His novels, often published in serial form, possess a restless, forward momentum. They are built from a mosaic of vivid details and unforgettable characters, each a marvel of caricature and psychological insight. Our collection of Charles Dickens’s works showcases this incredible talent for capturing life in all its messy, vibrant detail.
Hugo’s style, by contrast, is operatic and architectural. He is less interested in the texture of daily life than in the grand sweep of history and the eternal clash of archetypal forces: good versus evil, light versus darkness, fate versus free will. His novels are punctuated by long, digressive essays on everything from the history of the Paris sewers to the architecture of Notre Dame and the nature of slang. Where Dickens is a master of the social microcosm, Hugo is a poet of the sublime and the grotesque on a macrocosmic scale. His sentences are declarations, his chapters are cantos, and his novels are cathedrals of words. The man who subjected Dickens to a marathon poetry reading was the same man who would pause the narrative of *Les Misérables* for dozens of pages to expound upon the Battle of Waterloo. For Hugo, the novel was not just a story; it was a pulpit, a platform for his philosophical and political vision. It is little wonder, then, that the pragmatic English showman found the French prophet so utterly exhausting. Their very approaches to their craft reflected their personalities: one a brilliant observer of men, the other a self-styled interpreter of Man.
A Legacy of Difference and Shared Grandeur
Ultimately, the rivalry between Dickens and Hugo was not one of professional jealousy or bitter enmity. It was something more subtle and profound: the inevitable friction between two immense, self-contained worlds. They were like two neighboring mountains in the vast landscape of 19th century literature, each majestic in its own right, but too colossal to exist comfortably side-by-side. Their shadows fell upon each other. Yet, their respect for the work, for the sacred mission of the novelist, transcended their personal differences. Hugo’s elegy for Dickens stands as a testament to this, a generous tribute from one giant to another.
They remain linked in our literary imagination, the twin pillars of the social novel. Both harnessed the power of storytelling to advocate for the voiceless and challenge the conscience of their nations. They proved that a novel could be more than entertainment; it could be a force for justice, a cry for reform, and a testament to the resilience of the human spirit. Their cross-Channel relationship, a mix of admiration, misunderstanding, and clashing egos, only serves to humanize these literary deities, reminding us that even the greatest of writers are, in the end, magnificently, complicatedly human. The conversation between their works continues to this day, a timeless dialogue about poverty, justice, and the enduring power of compassion, exemplified in timeless tales like A Christmas Carol, which echoes the same profound themes of social responsibility found in Hugo’s most impassioned pleas.
Read also
Dickens and the wretched of the industrial age
Leo Tolstoy, between acknowledged literary genius and controversial thinker